By john Climate change has transformed from an environmental issue into a central component of foreign policy. Governments recognize that extreme Pokemon787 alternatif weather, sea-level rise, resource scarcity, and forced migration pose direct security risks. Therefore, countries now integrate “climate security” into their diplomatic agendas, framing environmental challenges as threats to national and global stability.
Many states incorporate climate risk assessments into defense planning. The U.S. Department of Defense, for example, identifies climate hazards as destabilizers of military bases and geopolitical hotspots. Similarly, European countries view climate-induced migration as a factor influencing regional security and humanitarian policy.
International cooperation is evolving accordingly. Groups like the Climate Security Mechanism within the UN focus on early-warning systems and crisis prevention. Small island states, facing existential threats, use diplomatic platforms to push large emitters toward binding climate commitments.
Climate finance is another battleground. Developing nations seek funding for adaptation and loss-and-damage compensation, while wealthier countries debate burden-sharing responsibilities. This financial dimension increasingly influences trade negotiations, energy policies, and geopolitical alliances.
Green technology competitiveness further shapes climate diplomacy. Countries aim to dominate renewable energy markets—solar, wind, alternative fuels—to secure long-term strategic advantage. China leads global manufacturing, the EU focuses on regulatory frameworks, and the U.S. invests heavily in energy transition innovation.
Climate security will shape foreign policy for decades. As climate impacts intensify, states must strengthen multilateral cooperation to prevent conflict, manage resource disputes, and support vulnerable populations.